Thursday, 17 August 2017

The Curious Case of Taylor Swift: What Her Assault Trial Revealed About What People Really Want From Their ''Favorite'' Celebrities

When did Taylor Swift become controversial?
At a glance, could there be anyone more suited to appeal to pretty much everyone, ever? Aspiring singer-songwriter with big dreams moves to Nashville to make a country album and, through her melodic candor about love won and lost and her warm embrace of her steadily growing fan base, transcends genres and continues to put out wildly infectious hit songs. She's got style, she's got grace... wait, those are the lyrics to "Vogue." Regardless, what's not to like?
Perhaps nothing. But that didn't prevent something strange from happening while Swift was becoming one of the defining pop superstars of a generation.

Maybe it's just the natural order of the universe, that when one type of energy is generated in one place, another type of counter-energy must form to balance it out.
Since Swift is so popular and so very successful in a quantifiable way, be it in number of albums sold, money earned or Grammys won, maybe it was only inevitable that an anti-Swift faction would naturally develop too, to counter the pro-Taylor rapture and, in their own minds at least, knock her down a peg.
More and more instances of that seem to be revealing themselves these days, largely thanks to social media, which was made for knee-jerk opinions. It's also now detrimentally easy to start or wade into an argument at any time of day or night. There are some celebrities who have always been "controversial," in that haters love to hate and the devoted fans are in it for the long haul (as are the haters, they just won't admit it). But now there's plenty of backlash to go around, for everyone, even the so-called beloved stars who had seemingly achieved untouchable status, like Meryl Streep or Justin Timberlake. (Or, in some cases, all the stars at once, if you're of the opinion that being an actor or musician means you've signed away your right to talk politics.)



As far as individual cases go, never was a widely adored star's vulnerability to an insta-takedown more evident, perhaps,  than when the Taylor Swift "party" suddenly ended in a pot of tea last summer when Kim Kardashian posted what sounded like audio proof that Taylor had agreed to at least half of the shout-out Kanye West gave her in "Famous."
Twitter erupted in hashtags and memes, and, somewhere, Whitney Houston was smiling at the resurgence of the word "receipts" as she once used it. But it didn't seem to be just Kardashian fans enjoying this meta moment, this multimedia progression of Kim defending Kanye in GQ, then referring to the "Famous" beef on Keeping Up With the Kardashians and, finally, directing people to Snapchat to share the big reveal.
People who might not otherwise have called themselves anti-Swifties on any given day were giddily reveling in Swift's comeuppance.
Not that Taylor blinked: She fired back a pointed statement defending herself and explaining exactly what the issue was.

It's not that we were under the impression that every single person on earth is a fan of her music. But whether people were irked because they believed she had been disingenuous (the edited tape ultimately didn't prove she knew about the "made that bitch famous" line, which is the line she took offense to) or self-righteous, or if they were more profoundly bothered because they love Katy Perry just that much, all of a sudden Taylor Swift—she of cats and cookies and Christmas presents, of platinum-selling albums, 10 Grammys and squad power—was a polarizing figure.
The suddenly contentious songwriting drama that had just unfolded and her still inexplicable round-the-world fling with Tom Hiddleston that was also happening at the time only served to heighten the feeling that the foundation was quaking 'neath the House of Swift.

Defending herself wasn't right, staying quiet wasn't right, her dating life wasn't right...it was a weird time. She gave one concert, in October, the roughly 80,000 people in attendance and thousands more gobbling up snippets of info about the show on Twitter putting to rest any concern that she wasn't as popular as ever. No one who loved her deserted her.
It's not that fans are so fickle. It's more that, as much as people are capable of blind support, more so are they capable of blind, blanket dislike. And neither needs very much of a reason to take root. Rarely has a personal slight occurred when people decide they "don't like" an actor or artist for whatever reason, but a grudge develops nonetheless—not ill will but just a general sense of "oh, I never liked them." The celebrity either unwittingly makes up for it somehow, resulting in the ol' "huh, I think I'm starting to like so-and-so" conversation, or they're just lumped into the "ew, I can't stand her" category forever.
Neither option of which affects the actual celebrity in any way, usually, but the world is full of amateur judges, judging away at any given time.
So after the summer, this negative energy had joined the positive in the Taylor Swift conversation and, a year later, we've been reminded that it didn't go away.


Last week, dueling lawsuits—the first filed by a man who alleged that Swift got him fired from his job as a radio DJ when she falsely accused him of groping her during a concert meet-and-greet, and the second Swift's countersuit, alleging assault and battery on his part for the grab in question and asking for $1 in symbolic damages—brought the singer to a Denver courtroom, her first public appearance in months and a relatively rare 2017 sighting over all.
The incident itself occurred in 2013. David Mueller (who denies grabbing her) sued Swift in 2015, prompting her to counter-sue a month later. Taylor spent most of 2015 on a 1989 World Tour tear, en route to winning the Album of the Year Grammy in February 2016, so this case was overshadowed by many other things happening at the time.
Now, in 2017, the trial begins and everything you might pessimistically expect from a he-said, she-said case of sexual assault occurred (questions about every decision she made in the moment, why she didn't report him to police if it really happened, skepticism and ignorance amid the support on social media etc.). Only there was an added twist because it was Taylor Swift, who, as some of her critics chose to point out, was just one of many victims of sexual assault, yet she was getting all this attention.

Different from carping about Taylor's polished image or the steely courage of her convictions, or whatever it is that puts her in the "ugh, don't like her" category for some, a newer backlash that had been simmering for months reared its head in response to the trial—which at its heart was about a woman determined to not let a man get away with violating her. Particularly after the judge dismissed Mueller's complaint mid-trial, then it was legally all about Taylor's allegation.
But while many voices came together to applaud her strength and courage, and the fact that in speaking up she was implicitly speaking up for other victims too, so too were many of those voices compelled to remind others that Swift didn't deserve any less respect as a victim or a plaintiff because she isn't one of the celebrities who counts as a consistently outspoken voice on behalf of women's issues.
She did not talk politics last year unlike so many other stars, most of whom—including Katy Perry and BeyoncĂ© vehemently supported Hillary Clinton in November. Though she had never talked politics before, her silence baffled some in this instance since she had spoken so forcefully in the past—such as at the Grammys when she won Album of the Year—about female empowerment and not taking any crap from those seeking to diminish you. 
And people didn't forget or forgive her silence. In January, when Swift tweeted (rare in itself lately) on the day of the Women's March, "So much love, pride, and respect for those who marched. I'm proud to be a woman today, and every day. #WomensMarch," she was immediately hit back with vitriol that amounted to "too little, too late."



So among the 5,500 comments her tweet prompted, some threw her support back in her face, not appreciating what they saw as fairweather solidarity from someone who then didn't march (also unlike so many other celebs, such as MadonnaScarlett Johanssonand Charlize Theron).
And that was their prerogative to criticize, but Swift's lack of visibility on the protest or political circuits doesn't make her any less of a woman—one who last week was vividly recalling the memory of something that happens to all too many women—or less entitled to the built-in backbone of support that some seemed so reluctant to provide for Swift but readily would for perhaps someone who...isn't Taylor Swift.
In February 2016 Swift donated $250,000 to Kesha amid the singer's still-ongoing legal battle with Dr. Luke, whom Kesha sued in 2014 for alleged sexual assault, harassment and gender violence. Her longtime producer counter-sued for defamation and numerous days in court (for their lawyers, at least) have followed. Last year a judge refused Kesha's plea to be let out of her six-album contract with Sony, which houses Dr. Luke's former imprint Kemosabe Records. Her new album, Rainbows, is her first studio LP in almost five years and it's dripping with references to her struggle in songs such as "Praying" and "Learn to Let Go."
"A persons wealth is not measured by what they have but by WHO they help with it. And Taylor Swift is a truly RICH PERSON. Thank you," Kesha's mom wrote on social media after they received Swift's donation—which was confirmed publicly via a brief statement from her rep, while Lady GagaDemi LovatoAriana Grande and other female artists were more audibly lending their support. "Most important for Kesha, is that these beautiful, powerful women are standing behind her, letting the world see how powerful the truth is!"

After a jury decided in Swift's favor on Monday, granting her $1 request and handing her a moral victory, Kesha tweeted, "@taylorswift13 i support you always, and especially right now and admire your strength and fearlessness. Truth is always the answer."
In her own statement, Swift thanked the court, judge, jury, her attorneys "for fighting for me and anyone who feels silenced by a sexual assault, and especially anyone who offered their support throughout this four-year ordeal and two-year long trial process."
She concluded, "I acknowledge the privilege that I benefit from in life, in society and in my ability to shoulder the enormous cost of defending myself in a trial like this. My hope is to help those whose voices should also be heard. Therefore, I will be making donations in the near future to multiple organizations that help sexual assault victims defend themselves."
Last night the Joyful Heart Foundation, which aids victims of sexual assault, domestic violence and child abuse, confirmed to E! Newsthat Swift had made a "generous" donation.



Despite all the people on Twitter calling for each other to shut up, staying relatively quiet about one's own point of view and the plights of others isn't always a popular choice in a media landscape supersaturated with competing voices, where some voices carry more weight than others. It's not unreasonable for people to want to hear more from one of the most famous, conceivably influential women in the world (so long as she agrees with them, because if she didn't...shut up, right?). But it's not any more reasonable to accuse Taylor Swift of fairweather feminism—especially considering the weather is almost never particularly fair, and support manifests itself in varying ways.
"Honestly, I didn't have an accurate definition of feminism when I was younger," Swift told Maxim in 2015, when the modern-day use of "squad" was coined practically in her honor and then subsequently was overused into oblivion. "I didn't quite see all the ways that feminism is vital to growing up in the world we live in. I think that when I used to say, 'Oh, feminism's not really on my radar,' it was because when I was just seen as a kid, I wasn't as threatening. I didn't see myself being held back until I was a woman.
"Or the double standards in headlines, the double standards in the way stories are told, the double standards in the way things are perceived," she continued. "A man writing about his feelings from a vulnerable place is brave; a woman writing about her feelings from a vulnerable place is oversharing or whining. Misogyny is ingrained in people from the time they are born. So to me, feminism is probably the most important movement that you could embrace, because it's just basically another word for equality."
She would soon find out that even saying all the right things doesn't matter. Her songs have been decried as not feminist enough, her Instagram-envy-inducing lifestyle isn't authentic enough, she doesn't get into the trenches with her fellow women enough.
Enough.
People can criticize her for not making her donations more private or her verbal support more public. They can decide that her image is just way too orchestrated. But neither changes the fact that she has poured money into causes, or that she has thrilled her young fans by visiting them in the hospital or popping up unannounced at their houses to deliver Christmas presents, or posing for endless photos backstage. And what's wrong with her wanting to make a point with that symbolic dollar, which simultaneously won her case and didn't lead to more legal fees and lost time while the other side appealed some sort of massive judgment that he probably couldn't pay in the first place? What better point was there to make than to say that ideally people should feel safe in speaking up when they've been violated—and the perpetrators shouldn't get away with it.
Other than to shore up her defenses by becoming even more protective of her privacy than she was when she was a 16-year-old starting out in Nashville, or a 23-year-old getting groped at a meet-and-greet, or a 26-year-old finding out a certain phone call had been recorded when it was posted on Snapchat, Taylor Swift's approach to her fellow women hasn't changed in recent years—for better or worse, depending on who you ask.
The way in which the world ruthlessly doles out judgment has changed, though, and that's all the more reason for someone to want to keep her opinions to herself.

Atlantic Resolve: U.S. Military Drills in Romania Signal Firepower in Europe

CAMPIA TURZII, Romania — Two American F-15 fighter jets roar down the runway, afterburners glowing, for a near vertical lift-off that pierces through an opening in the clouds.
Moments later, two Romanian MiG-21s follow them for a simulated dogfight over the hilly landscape of Transylvania.
Amid ongoing tensions with Russia, this training session in the former Communist corner of Southeast Europe is part of a wider U.S. military program — OperationAtlantic Resolve — that presents a show of force to potential foes.
“Two of those guys versus two of us came to a merge and there was fighting from there,” said Maj. John. M., one of the F-15 pilots. (The U.S. Air Force asks reporters not to publish his full name for security reasons).
In addition to the diplomatic standoff between the United States and Russia, concerns have been growing over a massive military exercise planned by Moscow over the next month. With thousands of Russian troops involved, Zapad 2017 could become the country’s largest military exercise since the end of the Cold War.
With American bases drastically reduced across Europe in recent decades, temporary deployments such as the 159th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron's currently stationing at Campia Turzii, Romania, are a way to show both allies and potential enemies that the U.S. military is still active in the region.
Image: U.S. F-15s temporarily stationed at Campia Turzii, Romania.
U.S. F-15s temporarily stationed at Campia Turzii, Romania. Carlo Angerer
“Operation Atlantic Resolve is our steadfast commitment to support our NATO allies in regional and collective security,” explains Lt. Col. George Downs, the squadron’s commander.
The program has already seen thereturn of A-10 Thunderbolt II "tankbuster" aircraft to Europe after military officials decided in 2015 that threats from Russia, ISIS, and others throughout Europe and North Africa demanded a renewed presence.
The 159th Expeditionary Fighter Squadron’s roughly 300 airmen and 12 F-15C Eagle fighter jets from the Louisiana and Florida Air National Guards have been running training missions across Europe this summer.
The squadron has taken over part of a hangar at the airfield and set up tents to support the mission, just as they would in a wartime deployment.
“We’re training with our Romanian allies so that we’re better integrated with them in case of future conflict,” Downs says.
Image: The U.S. Air Force stages drills alongside Romanian MiG-21s.
The U.S. Air Force stages drills alongside Romanian MiG-21s. Carlo Angerer
“We learn from them and their techniques and tactics, and at the same time, we’re teaching them alongside them with our tactics and techniques, so that we are more integrated with them.”
The training mission also gives U.S. pilots the rare chance to intercept aircraft such as the Romanian MiG-21, a supersonic fighter designed in the former Soviet Union.
“When we’re back home we’re typically used to training against ourselves, we’re always used to seeing F-15s in the air, which is a relatively big fighter,” says Maj. John M. “A MiG-21, which looks different, is quite a bit smaller, always creates a challenge to find them in the sky.”

Wednesday, 16 August 2017

You're Reading This Correctly: A Hunger Games Theme Park Is Coming


Have you ever wanted to be a Tribute and enter the Hunger Games? Maybe—if you have a deep sense of adventure (or a death wish).
For those of you have dreamed that the odds be ever in your favor, hoped to make a visit to the Capital or wanted to bop around District 12 looking for the Reaping, your prayers have been answered.
Lionsgate Entertainment Company just announced that in the near distant future you will be able to totally immerse yourself in a Hunger Games land at a new theme park in South Korea. So grab plane ticket (and your bow and arrows) and get let's get this dystopian party started!
Earlier today, the film company revealed that it would be opening a Lionsgate Movie World, a 1.3 million-square-foot theme park in South Korea dedicated to its catalog of films, including a world dedicated to the Hunger Games franchise. 

Lionsgate Movie World will be made up of seven different lands, which have been dubbed "zones," each devoted to a different Lionsgate film. The theme park will be part of Jeju Shinhwa World, a luxury resort on South Korea’s Jeju Island. The venture is Lionsgate's first branded theme park.
In addition to the Hunger Games-themed world, there will also be aTwilight-themed zone, a magic-themed Now You See Me zone, and a zone dedicated to the upcoming Robin Hood remake, which is due out in 2018.
Lionsgate CEO Jon Feltheimer in a statement, "We're pleased to partner with our friends at Landing International, one of Asia's premier developers, on our first branded outdoor theme park and one of our largest and most exciting location-based entertainment destinations."
According to the press release, guests will be able to "experience actual movie scenes," as well as various other experiences.
"Visitors can experience actual movie scenes through state-of-the-art rides, attractions and 4D Intellectual Property (IP) reproduced streets and towns.  Each zone will also feature themed restaurants, cafes, souvenir shops and entertainment performances," states the press release,
Additionally, the company says that the Lionsgate Movie World at Jeju Shinhwa World is expected to commence construction in 2018 and will be scheduled to open sometime in 2019.
The news comes on the heels of several movie studios venturing into the world of theme parks. Universal Pictures opened up the Wizarding World of Harry Potter at Universal Studios in Florida and California. Disneyland is opening up a land called Star Wars: Galaxy’s Edge.
20th Century Fox is opening up a series of international theme park lands based on Titanic and the Planet of the Apes franchise.

Thailand Post Will Begin Using Blockchain Tech This Year

Thailand’s railway and postal operators will begin using IoT and blockchain technology.

The State Railway of Thailand and Thailand Post will reportedly develop and apply blockchain and Internet of Things (IoT) technology as early as 2017’s end.
According to a report today by the Bangkok Post, the State Railway of Thailand (SRT) and Thailand Post, both state-owned operators of the country’s railways and postal services respectively, are implementing decentralized innovation to improve their logistics operations in the country.
Thailand Post could adopt and use blockchain technology for high-value packages including luxury items by the end of 2017 or early 2018, according to its director Thitipong Nandhabiwat.
He further stated:
Blockchain is secure and trusted as only authorized persons are allowed to open parcels.
The increase in blockchain development and adoption in Thailand comes at a time when the country’s national stock exchange operator is also working toward launching a trading marketplace for startups over a blockchain.  Over 600 companies registered with the Stock Exchange of Thailand (SET) after expressing interest in the blockchain marketplace soon earlier this year.
The SRT is specifically looking at developing a dedicated communications system, enabling the operator to gain real-time details of the exact arrival times of trains. Dedicated IoT devices in trains will help inform travelers in stations of any possible train delays. In the event of an accident or breakdown, the device will also help authorities stop any approaching trains in time to avoid disasters.
Speaking at a seminar this week, SRT chief information officer, SRT’s chief information officer Sirima Hiruncharoenvate revealed:
The SRT will invest 1 billion baht (approx. $30 million) over the next three years to upgrade its information and communications technology.
The decision to splash the cash to upgrade the railway network’s communications infrastructure comes after Thailand’s telecom regulator specifically approved the 800-9000 Mhz spectrum for a wireless railway communications system.


Tuesday, 15 August 2017

Sierra Leone Mudslide: 270 Bodies Recovered

Rescue workers have recovered 270 bodies so far from a mudslide in the outskirts of Sierra Leone's capital Freetown and the search continues for more, the mayor said on Tuesday.
Dozens of houses were covered in mud when a mountainside collapsed in the town of Regent on Monday morning, one of the deadliest natural disasters in Africa in recent years.
Image: Mudslide kills hundreds in Sierra Leone
People inspect the damage after a mudslide in the mountain town of Regent, Sierra Leone. Ernest Henry / Reuters
"We have a total of 270 corpses which we are now preparing for burial," Freetown mayor Sam Gibson told reporters outside city hall.
A mass burial today will free up space for more bodies in the central morgue, which is overloaded, a Reuters witness said.
Image: Mudslide kills hundreds in Sierra Leone
Residents of Freetown survey the damage caused by the mudslide in the suburb of Regent behind Guma reservoir. Ernest Henry / EPA
President Ernest Bai Koroma urged residents of Regent and other flooded areas around Freetown to evacuate immediately so that military personnel and other rescue workers could continue to search for survivors that might be buried underneath debris.
Rescue centers have been set up around the capital to register and assist victims, he said in a television address on Monday evening.

Trump Retweets User Who Called Him a ‘Fascist’

President Donald Trump took about 20 minutes to delete a pair of tweets on Tuesday morning — one which a user called the president a "fascist" and another showing a train with Trump's name on it running over the CNN logo.
The user, @MikeHolden42, was replying to a Fox News tweet, that the president had already retweeted, about how Trump has plans to pardon Sheriff Joe Arpaio. “He’s a fascist, so not unusual,” Mike Holden wrote about the president.
President Donald Trump retweeted this message Tuesday morning. Twitter
It didn’t take long for Holden to notice he had been retweeted by the world’s most famous tweeter.
Holden’s tweet was liked more than 2,000 times and retweeted nearly 450 times after Trump’s retweet.
“oooh, I'm going to have a lot of Trumpites to deal with today I reckon…” Holden tweeted after he noticed the president had shared his tweet with his 35.9 million followers.
On Twitter, Holden said he didn’t realize immediately that he had been retweeted by Trump, adding that his notifications on the site “went nuts.”
Holden now has one very unique addition he can make to his Twitter bio: “Endorsed by the President of the United States.”
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
Twitter
The CNN image was tweeted out by user @SLandinSoCal, who appears to be a staunch Trump supporter. @SLandinSoCal’s Twitter page consists of pro-Trump memes and retweets from other users disparaging Democrats while praising the president.
Trump was previously criticized for retweeting an edited video of himself tackling and repeatedly punching a figure with the CNN logo over its face.

Hall of famer Ric Flair hospitalized




Two-time WWE hall of famer Ric Flair has been hospitalized.
Melinda Morris Zanoni, CEO of Legacy Talent and Entertainment (the company that represents Flair) confirmed Flair, 68, went into surgery today and is recovering.
She previously tweeted that he was admitted to the hospital on Saturday for "routine monitoring." However, she changed her tone Sunday after she tweeted again, asking fans to pray for Flair as he was dealing with some "tough medical issues."
WWE later confirmed Nature Boy was placed in a medically induced coma as he prepared to undergo surgery today.

Are u a Fan/Friend of Ric Flair?If so, we need prayers & positive energy 4 our Living Legend as he is dealing w/some tough medical issues🙏🏻

Ric had surgery today (not❤️related)am happy 2report it was a success.Still a long road ahead so plz keep đź™ŹđźŹ»4Ric Charlotte Megan David&Wendy


Though neither Zanoni nor the WWE revealed Flair's complications, Zanoni did confirm it is not related to his heart.
Meanwhile, Flair's career legacy in the wrestling world extends over 40 years with him being widely regarded as the greatest professional wrestler of all time. Needless to say, many of his fans and WWE colleagues have tweeted their prayers.

Saying so many prayers for @RicFlairNatrBoy right now@MsCharlotteWWE you are in our thoughts & prayers toođź’›Praying for a speedy recover B&N

My thoughts and prayers go out to one of my heroes@RicFlairNatrBoy To be the man. You have to beat the man and NOTHING beats Ric Flair.




Thinking of and praying for a good friend, @RicFlairNatrBoyPraying the Nature Boy will beat this like he did all his opponents in the ring.






Our thoughts are with Flair and his family at this time.